Skip to content

Cursor vs Antigravity: Comparison Guide

Both tools have their own advantages. This chapter will help you decide which one to use and how to choose AI models in different scenarios.


Feature Comparison Table

DimensionCursorAntigravity
DeveloperAnysphere (US Independent Team)Google DeepMind
Base EditorCustomized VS CodeVS Code Extension / Independent App
AI ModelsClaude 4.x Series, GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, etc.Gemini 3 Pro/Flash, Claude 4.x, GPT-OSS, etc.
WorkflowConversational + Tab CompletionAgentic + Conversational
Knowledge CarrierRules (.cursor/rules/*.mdc)Skills (.agent/skills/*.md)
IntegrationAI deeply embedded in editorAgents complete multi-step tasks autonomously
Ease of Use⭐⭐ Very Simple⭐⭐⭐ Slightly complex but more powerful
Free PlanYes (Limited)Yes (Limited)
Price$20/month (Pro)~ $19/month
Chinese Support✅ Full support for Chinese dialogue✅ Full support for Chinese dialogue
Mbbrowser Integration✅ Via Rules injection✅ Via Skills injection

User Experience Comparison

Cursor is ideal for:

  • Beginners: Intuitive interface; just talk and start. Takes only 5 minutes to learn.
  • Step-by-step checking: Confirm code line-by-line after AI generation.
  • VS Code Users: Keyboard shortcuts and plugin ecosystem are identical.
  • Quick script writing: Free plan is sufficient for occasional tasks.

Antigravity is ideal for:

  • "Set it and forget it": AI creates files, writes tests, and debugs autonomously after you describe the task.
  • Full script frameworks: Antigravity can generate complete projects with config, utils, and main logic in one go.
  • Google Ecosystem users: Use your existing Google account; no extra registration needed.
  • Massive codebases: Gemini’s long context window (1M+ tokens) excels at understanding projects with tens of thousands of lines.

AI Model Selection Guide

Which model is best for Mbbrowser scripts?

Conclusion: Each has its best scenario.

ScenarioRecommended ModelReason
Generate Python Script (Single file)Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Cursor)Strongest overall coding; rigorous logic, best for complex projects.
Generate JS/TS Script (Single file)Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Cursor)Best at handling JS async/Promise/Agent logic.
Full Project (Multi-file)Gemini 3 Pro (Antigravity)Long context, Agent handles multi-steps autonomously; natively free.
Quick Code Snippet TweaksGemini 3 Flash or GPT-5.2Extremely fast; near-instant response.
Complex Logic/ArchitectureClaude Opus 4.6 Think modeDeep reasoning; most rigorous code architecture.

AI Model Coding Scores (Feb 2026, Mbbrowser Scenarios)

ModelPython ScriptPlaywright/PuppeteerMulti-threadingAPI Calls
Claude Sonnet 4.6⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
GPT-5.2 Codex High⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Gemini 3 Pro⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Gemini 3 Flash⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cursor Composer 1.5⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pricing Comparison

Cursor Pricing

PlanMonthly FeeAI UsageRecommendation
FreeFreeLimited (~50 premium requests/mo)Beginners
Pro$20/monthUnlimited (Flagship models)✅ Recommended
Business$40/user/moUnlimited + Team managementEnterprise

Antigravity Pricing

PlanMonthly FeeRecommendation
FreeFreeTrial
Pro~ $19/month✅ Recommended

Comprehensive Value

TIP

$20/month is less than $1/day, yet it drastically reduces script-writing time. For users running multi-account automations, an accurate script saves hours of work, offering a very high ROI.


My Recommendation Decision Tree

"I want to write Mbbrowser scripts using AI"
├── I have NO programming background
│   └── ➡️  Choose Cursor (Friendlier interface, natural dialogue)

├── I know a bit of Python/JS
│   ├── I just want to generate single script files
│   │   └── ➡️  Choose Cursor + Claude Sonnet 4.6
│   └── I want to create complex multi-file project frameworks
│       └── ➡️  Choose Antigravity + Gemini 3 Pro

└── I'm interested in both
    └── ➡️  Install BOTH! Use Cursor for single scripts and Antigravity for large projects.

TIP

Chosen your tool? Next step is crucial: MBBrowser Rules Package — Inject complete Mbbrowser API knowledge into AI to make it truly understand Mbbrowser!